On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Daπid <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I have seen that there are some missing functions in numpypy that > could be implemented, at least naïvely, very easily. An example of > this is zeros_like, as we have zeros and shape. Another example is the > random module, easy to port using list comprehension and the random > module from the standard library. In any case, based on the benchmarks > I have seen, I think the pypy version would be even faster than the > pure CPython+Numpy. > > Would you be interested in a sub-optimal port of those functions? In > my opinion, it is better to have something not great (that could be > improved) that nothing at all. If so, what should I do? > The only requirement is that they come with tests (including weird corner cases) Cheers, fijal
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
