Ok, I will start working on that. Hopefully, you will hear of me again.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Daπid <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have seen that there are some missing functions in numpypy that >> could be implemented, at least naïvely, very easily. An example of >> this is zeros_like, as we have zeros and shape. Another example is the >> random module, easy to port using list comprehension and the random >> module from the standard library. In any case, based on the benchmarks >> I have seen, I think the pypy version would be even faster than the >> pure CPython+Numpy. >> >> Would you be interested in a sub-optimal port of those functions? In >> my opinion, it is better to have something not great (that could be >> improved) that nothing at all. If so, what should I do? > > > The only requirement is that they come with tests (including weird corner > cases) > > Cheers, > fijal > _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
