Which source files/functions/line numbers should I take a look at, as specifically as possible?
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Steven Jackson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am definitely open to working on Numpy first, my only hesitation was > that > > it might be hard to get spun up, and scipy seemed like something I could > > slice off and do (some of) by myself without accidentally conflicting > with > > ongoing development efforts. > > > > If, as your replies have indicated, Numpy isn't being very actively > > developed, and it would be easy to get caught up and avoid conflicting > with > > other developers, then I'd be glad to help there instead of independently > > trying to get scipy going. > > That sounds very good to me. The thing I started (and I'm not actively > working on it for at least a week or two more) is to clean up stuff > and try to reuse pure-python numpy part without changes > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Daπid <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I believe the reason is that they prefer to focus the development > >> effort into the more "basic" Numpy and from that go on. Numpy is not > >> fully implemented > >> > >> I am working (actually, right now I am only in the "thinking" state) > >> on some modules of NumPy, maybe we could coordinate and give this a > >> boost. > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Steven Jackson > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I know there is no current plan to implement scipy in pypy, but > >> > searching > >> > the PyPy website, I was not able to find the reason. > >> > > >> > If it is not to be included as a feature due to lack of interest or > >> > developer time, I am offering to begin rewriting scipy in pure python > (I > >> > have quite a bit of free time to do this). > >> > If it has been discussed and actively excluded from pypy, I would like > >> > to > >> > know that before I waste too much time rewriting it. > >> > > >> > I have an active interest in being able to use some modules which > depend > >> > on > >> > scipy while using the PyPy interpreter (especially pyBrain). I have > seen > >> > the > >> > hack on the pypy blog: > >> > > >> > > >> > > http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2011/12/plotting-using-matplotlib-from-pypy.html > >> > > >> > I could simply use the hack myself, but unless there's a reason not > too, > >> > I > >> > think it'd be nice to have scipy available as a pure python module > >> > (perhaps > >> > called scipypy in the same manner as numpy). > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Steven Jackson > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > pypy-dev mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Steven Jackson > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pypy-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev > > > -- Steven Jackson
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
