David Cournapeau, 08.08.2012 23:59: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Matti Picus wrote: >> Someone tried getting f2py working on pypy a while ago, a quick search >> turned up >> http://www.dalkescientific.com/writings/diary/archive/2011/11/09/f2pypy.html >> and a fork of code at >> https://bitbucket.org/pypy/f2pypy >> >> Perhaps that could be a starting point? > > Yes, definitely, although there are tools which are better architected > like fwrap (https://github.com/kwmsmith/fwrap). > > I would expect something based on f2py to be the fastest route, > though. fwrap would more likely lend to something that could be > contributed by and useful to both cpython and pypy-based > implementations.
FWIW, another reason why fwrap is popular, besides a better design, is that it can automatically generate Cython declarations for a Fortran wrapper, so it already supports two targets. Adding PyPy as a third one would reduce the need for users to learn new tools. Stefan _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
