On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, John Camara <john.m.cam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> that is definitely a no (my screen is too small to have some noise >> there, if for no other reason), it might have a warning in the >> documentation though, if it's any useful. But honestly, I doubt such a >> warning makes any sense. People who are capable of using jitviewer >> already "know better". > > I agree it should not be part of the normal output. I would say add it to > the doc string in app.py and to the README file. As far as people using the > jitviewer already "know better". If that's the case I wouldn't have started > this thread. Like you said earlier the use of jitviewer is only promoted on > irc and yet I have come across 3 people working on different projects who > are using it for the wrong reasons over the last 2 weeks. It's like this is > the new RPython where people start using it for the wrong reasons. > >
Seriously which ones? I think msgpack usage is absolutely legit. You seem to have different opinions about the design of that software, but you did not respond to my concerns even, not to mention the fact that it sounds like it's not "obfuscated by jitviewer". Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
