Hi Yury, On 21 June 2015 at 21:37, Yury V. Zaytsev <y...@shurup.com> wrote: > Yes, I agree with you on that, but personally, I don't see much of a > problem with folks out there playing with source to source translation > and type inference; to my mind that's perfectly alright.
Yes, sorry if I was unclear. It's also ok for me. That's what I alluded to: I don't see any reason to fight against the "non-PyPy" approaches---not that I consider them as uninteresting nonsense, but simply that they are very different approaches, and cross-discussions don't seem to work at this point (it seems that some of us tried and failed to get some discussions started with numpy people; please be aware that this is second-hand experience though.) Until we have good enough results to not be so easily ignorable, I guess the situation won't change. (Alternatively, we need a champion from the community ready to write papers for the same kinds of journals... which, I agree with you, is a strange place to write about JIT compilers) A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
