On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 at 14:44 Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com> wrote:
With your code (although I didn't import io.open) I found the timings: > CPython 2.7: 1.4s > PyPy 2.7: 2.3s > > I changed it to > for line in f: # (not f.readlines()) > a += len(line) > > With that change I get: > CPython 2.7: 1.3s > PyPy 2.7: 0.6s > > Note that all of the timings above are "warm cache". That means that the file was already cached in memory by the operating system because I had recently read/written it. The time taken to load the file cold cache (e.g. after rebooting) would probably be much longer in all cases so that the difference between PyPy and CPython would not be significant. The problem you've posted should really be IO bound which isn't really the kind of situation where PyPy gains you much speed over CPython. -- Oscar
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
