On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ondřej Bílka <nel...@seznam.cz> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 03:58:12PM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >> it's sort-of-known, we have a branch to try to address this, the main >> problem is that we try to do buffering ourselves as opposed to just >> use libc buffering, which turns out to be not as good. Sorry about >> that :/ >> > Do you have testcase to report? I could fix that.
testcase of what? PyPy buffering not being up to scratch compared to libc buffering? _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
