Yeah, that's a very good point worth mentioning. I am not against an idea going just with a static version.
po 1. 1. 2018 v 18:05 odesílatel anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> napsal: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Kotrfa <kot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey, > > > > as I said, I am not a professional, but I would be willing to help with > the > > site. I have built couple of websites in Django/Wagtail (or plain HTML), > > have some basic knowledge about design (+ frontend CSS/JS/HTML). The site > > seems quite simple, so if we just did a revamp, it shouldn't take a long. > > Also, if we went with Wagtail, adding blog capabilities would be also > > trivial. > > Just want to warn that Wagtail and Django means database, which adds > maintenance overhead compared to current static version. Logins, spam > and all that stuff.. I don't mind against custom blog engine, but > putting all static content from version control into Wagtail/Django > database doesn't seem a good solution to me. When site gets hacked, > for example to change donation credentials, there is no trace who did > what. So going with simple static site solution is probably a better > way. It also doesn't require permission or privilege to send a pull > request, and content previews can be made with Netlify. > > Happy New Year. =) >
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
