Given the following sip fragment...
class Foo
{
virtual void bar( SIP_PYOBJECT ) [void (UnwrappedType)];
%MethodCode
// ...
%End
%VirtualCatcherCode
// ...
%End
};
Sip will compain about UnwrappedType not being defined. I don't
believe it should need to be defined in the presence of the
%VirtualCatcherCode, as it is only used verbatim in the method's
argument list.
I had a look at relaxing this restriction myself, but given my limited
experience with sip internals, this change seems non-trivial.
Is it possible to relax the type checking for C++ signatures in the
presence of hand written virtual handler code?
James
_______________________________________________
PyKDE mailing list [email protected]
http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
