On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Matti Airas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Here's the first draft of the PSEP describing the new-style signals and >> slots in PySide. Please comment, otherwise I'll just accept it without >> further ado early next week. :-)
Have you rejected the += and -= operator overloads for connecting and disconnecting signals? > > Regarging the renaming "pyqtSignal => signal"; I think pyqt follows > this convention to avoid (future?) naming clashes with Qt. Does pyside > have the luxury of ignoring such a convention? And even if it's not to avoid future name clashes, it's a little unintuitive having a pair of functions which differ only by case (QtCore.signal vs QtCore.SIGNAL). "pyqtSignal" should clearly not be the standard name though. > > -- > Ville M. Vainio > http://tinyurl.com/vainio > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
