On 28.02.2012 13:31, ext Thomas Perl wrote: > Yes, I'd also like to propose that the Github repository should (at > some point in the future when the transition is finished) be a public > mirror of the state of PySide inside Gerrit (if Gerrit/Qt Project > doesn't provide any open repos itself).
True, that would be a good way to do it. I didn't pay attention to the fact that the Gerrit repos indeed require authentication - good for Anatoly to point that out. Qt uses Gitorious to provide read-only access for the other Qt repos. However, if we are to retain the old repos for archival purposes (which we IMO need to do, at least somewhere), we need to shuffle things around a bit. Cheers, ma. _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
