On 28.02.2012 13:43, ext Matti Airas wrote: > On 28.02.2012 13:31, ext Thomas Perl wrote: >> Yes, I'd also like to propose that the Github repository should (at >> some point in the future when the transition is finished) be a public >> mirror of the state of PySide inside Gerrit (if Gerrit/Qt Project >> doesn't provide any open repos itself). > True, that would be a good way to do it. I didn't pay attention to the > fact that the Gerrit repos indeed require authentication - good for > Anatoly to point that out. > > Qt uses Gitorious to provide read-only access for the other Qt repos. > However, if we are to retain the old repos for archival purposes (which > we IMO need to do, at least somewhere), we need to shuffle things around > a bit.
OK, this is what we'll do: To align with other Qt projects (and to be able to use their mirroring scripts), I'll rename the existing gitorious repos to -archive, and we'll use the original gitorious repo URLs for the mirrors. That way, the URLs remain the same for the read-only repos. Cheers, ma. _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
