On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Hugo Parente Lima <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 16 March 2012 12:00:44 anatoly techtonik wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Hugo Parente Lima >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > gerrit only sync PySide repositories with gitorious, so the git-hub >> > repositories will be out dated because nobody will remember to sync them >> > :-/ >> > >> > So, my question is: Should I remove PySide from git-hub? No code will be >> > lost because the helper repositories found on github and not on gerrit >> > can be found on gitorious. >> >> Nooo. Many people can't access Gerrit and can't submit patches therefore. >> Gitorious suxx as was discussed many times. I'd like BuildScripts to >> continue using GitHub. Because barrier for patch entry to Gerrit is too >> high. >> >> Why isn't it possible to sync with GitHub? >> http://gerrit.googlecode.com/svn/documentation/2.1.5/config-replication.htm >> l > > I agree, but this configuration isn't up to me, I need to ask to people on qt- > project if they can do this for us. I'm going to ping them after the weekend.
I was about to sent a request to [email protected] but then noticed that PySide and Gitorious repos are in sync: http://qt.gitorious.org/pyside/pyside/commits/master https://github.com/PySide/PySide/commits/master Is GitHub sync still an issue? It may worth to add a note though that the proper place to sent patches is Gerrit. BTW, what was the decision about http://www.pyside.org/ ? It can be hosted on GitHub. -- anatoly t. _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
