On Wednesday 21 March 2012 06:16:47 anatoly techtonik wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Matti Airas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 16.03.2012 13:21, ext Hugo Parente Lima wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> gerrit only sync PySide repositories with gitorious, so the git-hub > >> repositories will be out dated because nobody will remember to sync them > >> :-/ > >> > >> So, my question is: Should I remove PySide from git-hub? No code will be > >> lost because the helper repositories found on github and not on gerrit > >> can be found on gitorious. > > > > Hi, > > > > I think it's OK to have the repos mirrored there, but in a read-only > > mode. If the GitHub repos would be read-write, in that case I think the > > GitHub project name have to be something else than PySide to indicate > > that the repos are a fork of the official project. > > How about killing those Gerrit repositories and leaving them archived on > Github? They are not needed for development anymore. > > pyside/apiextractor > ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/pyside/apiextractor.git > pyside/generatorrunner > ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/pyside/generatorrunner.git
They can still archived everywhere, this doesn't hurt because they all are synchronized, the problem with this multi-repository issue we have is that users may get out dated code from a git repository. > -- > anatoly t. > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside -- Hugo Parente Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
