Hugo Parente Lima wrote: > Is normal, our the binding generator code base is a mess to understand due to > various historical events occurred during the development, in the ideal world > the generator would be written in Python with a clean code base, just the > helper libraries in C++ (libshiboken and libpyside), but this would require a > full rewrite of the generator :-/. Our typesystem file inherited from Qt-Jambi > is also not the better way to give hints to the generator about how to > generate bindings.
This was our impression also. This and any other effort towards making PySide easier to understand, better documented, etc, will certainly go a long way to making it maintainable. The worst thing that actually bites us in practice are problems w/ object references and object life cycle (PySide object remains when C++ object is gone, and similar). Since our time is constrained, we've focused on this rather than something more ambitious like rewriting the generator in Python. - Stephan _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list PySide@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
