On 12/10/12 8:38 AM, Hugo Parente Lima wrote: > Is normal, our the binding generator code base is a mess to > understand due to various historical events occurred during the > development, in the ideal world the generator would be written in > Python with a clean code base, just the helper libraries in C++ > (libshiboken and libpyside), but this would require a full rewrite > of the generator :-/. Our typesystem file inherited from Qt-Jambi > is also not the better way to give hints to the generator about how > to generate bindings.
My thought on the code generator was to have the C++ parser write the parse tree out to some xml file that could then be read by a code generator written in python. Then the C++ parser could possibly be replaced with something else and the generator could be more quickly improved since it's now implemented in python. Changing it would still require C++ knowledge, though, because it's emitting C++ code. > There are a lot of bug reports, but the Jira bug tracker is > horrible to search bugs, change bug status, etc... Is there anyone on this list that knows enough about the bug tracker to help people learn how to use it effectively? I think I gave up when I tried to close one of the bugs I reported and couldn't figure out how to do it. Or should we be looking for another tracker? Cheers, John _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list PySide@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
