2010/7/9 Felix Schlesinger <schle...@cshl.edu>
> Francesc Alted <faltet <at> pytables.org> writes:
> > If EArray appends are much faster then VLArray appends
> > I might go with that. More benchmarking needed as always.
> > Yes. Some benchmarks would be nice to have.
>
> In my specific case (Atom=('i4',2), a few million entries, Intel
> 64bit CPU, ...) appending to the EArray is about 10 times
> faster then appending the same number of elements to the
> VLArray in rows with an average length of 1 and maximal length
> of 5. Reading is about 2 times faster.
>
Great. Are you using Blosc? If not, I'd bet that it will accelerate things
on EArray still more.
--
Francesc Alted
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Pytables-users mailing list
Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
