On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 22:06 -0700, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> On 17 June 2015 at 05:31, Bruno Oliveira <nicodde...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, Do we have an idea of when we would like have a 2.8.0 release, or at
> > least what we would like to see in the new version?
> 
> Nope, maybe the pluggy dependency?  But not sure if that was the plan.

FWIW I consider to vendor the pluggy dependency before pytest-2.8 is released.
The main issue is that as projects start using pluggy indepdently of pytest
there might be version conflicts when pluggy gets new releases, making
it hard to test pluggy-using projects with pytest.

> > And about 2.7.2?
> 
> I think we should release that as soon as the python 3.5 compatibility
> is sorted.  I'm on holiday for a few days though so won't get to look
> at this again until mid-next week (but don't let that stop someone
> else ;-)).
>
> I think Ronny had some 2.7.2 plans as well or wanted it soon for some reason?
> 
> > I see
> > there are a couple of fixes that are in master but should be backported to
> > pytest-2.7 branch before making a 2.7.2 release.
> 
> Hmm, if they where fixes I guess they should have gone to 2.7 right
> away.  Sometimes the line is a bit blurry though.  It obviously
> doesn't matter much if 2.8 overtakes 2.7.2, so if there's nothing
> important that needs to happen for 2.8 then that would be fine too.

Maybe we can just aim for pytest-2.8 in the next two weeks and forget
about pytest-2.7.2 and then see to have more clarity regarding PR targets.
Would it make sense to consider "master" to become the new "bug fix branch"
and have a "pytest-2.9" then where we collect new features? This way
the default is to do bugfixes which might be easier for newcomers to
the project.

best,
holger
_______________________________________________
pytest-dev mailing list
pytest-dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev

Reply via email to