On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:22 +0200, Tibor Arpas wrote: > How about the new hook call system vs the old __multicall__ ? Is the plan > still to deprecate the old way in 2.8 and remove in 2.9?
yes, that's the plan. > Any idea how many plugin-s use it and will brake (or were already updated)? IIRC most pytest-dev plugins don't use __multicall__ last time i checked. holger > Tibor > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:47 AM, holger krekel <hol...@merlinux.eu> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 22:06 -0700, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > > > On 17 June 2015 at 05:31, Bruno Oliveira <nicodde...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, Do we have an idea of when we would like have a 2.8.0 release, or > > at > > > > least what we would like to see in the new version? > > > > > > Nope, maybe the pluggy dependency? But not sure if that was the plan. > > > > FWIW I consider to vendor the pluggy dependency before pytest-2.8 is > > released. > > The main issue is that as projects start using pluggy indepdently of pytest > > there might be version conflicts when pluggy gets new releases, making > > it hard to test pluggy-using projects with pytest. > > > > > > And about 2.7.2? > > > > > > I think we should release that as soon as the python 3.5 compatibility > > > is sorted. I'm on holiday for a few days though so won't get to look > > > at this again until mid-next week (but don't let that stop someone > > > else ;-)). > > > > > > I think Ronny had some 2.7.2 plans as well or wanted it soon for some > > reason? > > > > > > > I see > > > > there are a couple of fixes that are in master but should be > > backported to > > > > pytest-2.7 branch before making a 2.7.2 release. > > > > > > Hmm, if they where fixes I guess they should have gone to 2.7 right > > > away. Sometimes the line is a bit blurry though. It obviously > > > doesn't matter much if 2.8 overtakes 2.7.2, so if there's nothing > > > important that needs to happen for 2.8 then that would be fine too. > > > > Maybe we can just aim for pytest-2.8 in the next two weeks and forget > > about pytest-2.7.2 and then see to have more clarity regarding PR targets. > > Would it make sense to consider "master" to become the new "bug fix branch" > > and have a "pytest-2.9" then where we collect new features? This way > > the default is to do bugfixes which might be easier for newcomers to > > the project. > > > > best, > > holger > > _______________________________________________ > > pytest-dev mailing list > > pytest-dev@python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev > > -- about me: http://holgerkrekel.net/about-me/ contracting: http://merlinux.eu _______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list pytest-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev