On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 12:02 +0000, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > Hi, > > Overall looks great! > > On 3 February 2016 at 10:31, holger krekel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:20 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote: > >> * holger krekel <[email protected]> [2016-02-03 10:00:27 +0000]: > >> > I am particular unsure about the "perks" ... > >> > >> Stickers sound good. Maybe T-Shirts as well, for something between > >> EUR 50 and EUR 500? If I wasn't involved in pytest but liking it a > >> lot, I'd be willing to spend EUR 100 or so, but I'd like something > >> more than 10 stickers in return ;) > >> > >> OTOH it's some work and logistic overhead someone would need to > >> tackle. > >> > >> "fix an issue" sounds a bit problematic. I'd rather not give the > >> blanket promise of fixing a particular thing or introducing a feature, > >> this has the potential to "force" us to do things nobody considers a > >> good idea, if things go bad. Maybe more something like "vote on a > >> specific bug/feature we'll consider a priority"? > > > > "tackle an issue?" > > I agree with this worry, "Prioritise an issue" seems a safer way to > say this. And maybe hint about having a chat with us first if you > feel strongly to avoid disappointment. > > Secondly do we need limits on the number of issues and topics we can > have? It's kind of odd to limit but likewise we can't have 20 topics > and 200 issues as we'll just have to disappoint (and to be honest, we > might be more motivated working on other bits ;-)).
sure, we can limit. If we got 20 topics and 200 issues that'd be 120K Euros in funding, though ;) > >> What about some document about the sprint where funders will be > >> listed, with higher perks with (company) logo/URL? That's something > >> I've seen a lot with other campaigns and seems reasonable to me. > > > > Yes, i am fine. > > Can we make being listed as supporter opt-in for all levels? Then we > can add logo and links for higher level sponsors (€500-€1000). no clue if that's possible, could you look at the interface yourself? (i invited you as editor) > I also wonder if it's worth going into more detail about what we might > work on, currently seems rather vague. For example I'd like to work > on the "failing tests from finalizers"/addverifier which I'd be happy > to summarise in a paragraph. It might give people something more > explicit too look forward too, rather then just the next release. > Just the next release will happen anyway, maybe a bit later or with a > fewer features but it will happen. Sure, it's intentionally vague as i don't want the campaign to predetermine everything. Adding paragraphs about intentions in a separate section makes sense i guess. holger > Regards, > Floris > -- about me: http://holgerkrekel.net/about-me/ contracting: http://merlinux.eu _______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
