On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 19:08 -0800, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> Bruno Oliveira <nicodde...@gmail.com> writes:
> > A PR[1] has been submitted which adds `parameterize` as an alias to
> > `parametrize`. Florian Bruhin and I are not very keen to the idea given
> > that there is an explicit warning for it already and having different names
> > to the same thing reduces consistency across test suites.
> 
> So I've recently finished a (toy) plugin which I've been intending to
> release as pytest-parawtf.  It's currently in the legal machine of my
> employer for me to hopefully be able to release unrestricted.  You can
> probably guess what it does from the name, but it basically allows a few
> misspellings in all locations.  I actually considered allowing anything
> matching the ``param*`` wildcard but thought while fun it would probably
> stop people from using it.
> 
> However the serious note in that plugin is that I think it makes sense
> to use ``params``.  My reasoning is that it's easy to spell and already
> used for fixtures: ``@pytest.fixture(params=[0, 1])``.  So why not
> everywhere else:  ``@pytest.mark.params('a', [0, 1])``,
> ``metafunc.params(...)``.  So to be honest I think we should migrate to
> that and still disallow the other variants.  It would mean I don't get
> to release my fun plugin but whatever.

i initially meant to write my skepticism wrt to going the
"alternative spellings" route but FWIW i do like "params" as it also matches
accessing a parameter via "request.param" inside fixture functions. For
``metafunc.X`` i rather expect X to be a verb, however. /me fiddles with
the parameters of what he supposes is a time-machine ... 

That being said i don't like the idea of making tons of existing code
throw warnings, let alone having "pytest.mark.parametrize" erroring out
in future pytest versions. I guess i am aware of too many existing code
bases (and written and printed tutorials and books) which would
suffer. Independently from the question at hand I recommend to be
careful with the notion of "people can just rename their code".

holger
_______________________________________________
pytest-dev mailing list
pytest-dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev

Reply via email to