> As for the % operator, I never liked it -- either a builtin function,
> or even better a method of string objects, is going to be much more
> readable (and my preference would be to have it take optional
> positional arguments, corresponding to {1}, {2}, etc, and optional
> named arguments, corresponding to {name} &c).
Sure, I prefer the builtin function myself to the % operator. But I
still like the printf-like syntax of the formatting commands, and
think that %(foo) is a reasonable extension to that syntax.
Bill
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
