"Steven Bethard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/30/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, first step in my mind is settling if we want to add one more depth to > > the stdlib, and if so, how we want to group (not specific groupings, just > > general guidelines). > > I think that having a package level that exactly matches the divisions > in the Library Reference (http://docs.python.org/lib/lib.html) would > be great. Currently, that would mean packages for:
Agreed. Though I'm probably a bit strange in that I almost want a top level "py" package, and a separating of site-packages from the sys.path and into a top level package named "site". The former would make clear that you expect the module to be in the standard library, and the latter would make clear that you want a site-packages-specific module/package. - Josiah _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
