On 5/30/06, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Steven Bethard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think that having a package level that exactly matches the divisions > > in the Library Reference (http://docs.python.org/lib/lib.html) would > > be great. Are there any *dis*agreements with this? > Though I'm probably a bit strange in that I almost want a top level "py" > package, and a separating of site-packages from the sys.path and into a > top level package named "site". > The former would make clear that you expect the module to be in the > standard library, and the latter would make clear that you want a > site-packages-specific module/package. I agree with this too, despite Guido's stance. -jJ _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
