On 7/27/06, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [1] It might get you something for __hash__() if object.__hash__() is > not removed, but that debate still seems to be in progress and I'm not > sure it's worth the added complexity to handle one special case.
FWIW, I don't believe your "solution" to remove __hash__ and supply an id-dict will work. Unless someone else supports it, it's off the table as far as I'm concerned. Sorry, I can't exactly explain why, but my gut tells me that. Maybe someone else can explain it to you. Or maybe someone else can provide better support for your idea. By default, I consider it dead. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
