[Fredrik Lundh] >> (on the other hand, "s[:len(t)] == t" is usually faster than "s.startswith(t)" for short >> prefixes,
[Greg Ewing] > That's surprising. Any idea why this might be? Perhaps it has to do with the rest of his message ;-): >> (which reminds me that speeding up handling of optional arguments >> to C functions would be an even better use of this energy) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
