Nick Coghlan wrote: >> Nick Coghlan wrote: >> >>> With a variety of "view types", that work like the corresponding builtin >>> type, >>> but reference the original data structure instead of creating copies >> >> support for string views would require some serious interpreter surgery, >> though, >> and probably break quite a few extensions... > > Why do you say that?
because I happen to know a lot about how Python's string types are implemented ? > make a view of it so to make a view of a string, you make a view of it ? </F> _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
