Phillip J. Eby wrote: > That kludge, as you call it, is something called idempo... whoops, I > almost used an architecture word there!
No, that's a mathematical term. And while Greg wasn't using that word, he was actually talking about its CS form, where it means something similar, but not entirely equivalent. In math, something is idempotent if you can change f(x) to f(f(x)) and still get the same result; in CS, something is idempotent if you can do f(x) twice on the same x, and get the same result both times. Python's len() function is idempotent in the CS sense, but not in the math sense. And Python's iter() is not necessarily idempotent in the CS sense when used on an *iterable*, but it is, in both senses, when used on an iterator. Which was Greg's point, I think. > We should never reuse words to describe similar things, because then > people would be confused. Well, I'd say you just illustrated the danger of using the same word to described two similar but yet distinctly different concepts. </F> _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
