> Yes, and that's where it falls down, as far as I can > see. It's not just that it's "not quite" automatic, > it's almost completely *non*-automatic. Given that, > I see little benefit in having a formal mechanism > for it.
I don't see your point here. Are you arguing that pretty much every approach being discussed is bad and we should instead implement something magically transforming types? I'm strongly -1 if that's the case. All proposals so far do some kind of conditional jumping only in specific entry points depending on features (class, interface, ability, whatever) declared for the object. -- Gustavo Niemeyer http://niemeyer.net _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
