On 1/1/07, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also have this feeling that by ditching so much that's widely used, > we're setting Python 3.0 up for a lot of criticism that the batteries > were removed.
I was uncomfortable with telnet leaving for that reason. > For example, as icky as all those server modules are, > they're darn handy and a lot of code has been written for them. > Maybe I'm totally off base here, but it seems like it's one thing to > restructure the hierarchy, and pepify the names, but it's another to > just remove code unless there are compelling enough alternatives that > folks are willing to rewrite everything to use them. There is the 'lib-old' directory for modules that are unsupported but we're not ready to finish off. Alternatively, they can be put in a Cheeseshop package. -- Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
