On 3/2/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone tried to create a 2to3 transformer for this? I think it > should be possible, although there are a few warts (like inserting the > new code after the docstring, and how to come up with names for the > anonymous tuple(s), and having to do it for potentially any number of > arguments. Still, it would require no dataflow analysis, and the > except transformer already has a similar statement insertion. So I > think it's doable.
I can take a crack at this. I had to do similar things for the raise fixer before switching it over to use with_traceback(). Collin Winter _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
