> Are we going to have a preference over PyObject_HEAD or defining the > struct field directly?
That is an open issue. PyObject_HEAD clearly is more backwards-compatible. However (besides its current non-C-conformance), I never liked it, because of the missing semicolon (I thought it confuses Emacs, but can't reproduce the problem anymore, though - perhaps it did confuse Emacs in the past?) So I personally would phase it out for style reasons, but others may think differently; if I hear opinions in either direction, I'm happy to code them into the PEP. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
