"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Expect pushback on your assumption that every function or method
> should be fair game for overloading. Requiring explicit tagging the
> base or default implementation makes things a lot more palatable and
> predictable for those of us who are still struggling to accept GFs.
Front-up tagging might make it more palatable but IMHO it would be a
serious mistake.
I still shudder when I think of C++'s `virtual` (although it's been a
looong time since I stopped using C++ [thanks, Guido!] :-)
PS: I didn't have time to really study Phillip's PEP but I've followed
the GF saga over the months and I'd be very happy if GF's were
promoted to be a core feature of Python!
--
Christian Tanzer http://www.c-tanzer.at/
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
