On 6/6/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/6/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A few PEPs with numbers < 400 are now targeting Python 3000, e.g. PEP > 367 (new super) and PEP 344 (exception chaining). Are there any > others? I propose that we renumber these to numbers in the 3100+ > range. I can see two forms of renaming: > > (a) 344 -> 3344 and 367 -> 3367, i.e. add 3000 to the number > > (b) just use the next available number > > Preferences? > > What other PEPs should be renumbered? > > Should we renumber at all? Renumbering, +1; using the next 31xx number, +1.
Renumbering +1 Leaving (old PEP number) in place as a stripped down PEP that just points to the new number: +1 Collin Winter
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/shiblon%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
