On 6/7/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nick Coghlan schrieb: > > Guido van Rossum wrote: > >> A few PEPs with numbers < 400 are now targeting Python 3000, e.g. PEP > >> 367 (new super) and PEP 344 (exception chaining). Are there any > >> others? I propose that we renumber these to numbers in the 3100+ > >> range. I can see two forms of renaming: > >> > >> (a) 344 -> 3344 and 367 -> 3367, i.e. add 3000 to the number > >> > >> (b) just use the next available number > >> > >> Preferences? > >> > >> What other PEPs should be renumbered? > >> > >> Should we renumber at all? > >> > > > > +1 for renumbering to the next available 31xx number, with the old > > number kept as a pointer to the new one. > > That would be my vote too.
And so it is done. 344 -> 3134, 367 -> 3135. I've left the old ones in place with status "Replaced" and a "Numbering Note" in front of the abstract. Are there any other candidates for such a renumbering? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
