--- Jim Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/12/07, Steve Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > In my best franglais: je pense que les avocats de > PEP > > 3131 pourrait surmonter la doute, l'incertitude, > le > > crainte, etc., de PEP 3131 en montrant les > exemples. > > Not really; I think everyone agrees that you *can* > produce > well-written code with non-ASCII identifiers. > > The concerns are with not-so-well written code, or > code that is mostly > ASCII with a few non-ASCII characters (or ids) > thrown in around line > 343. >
But then I would extend the same challenge to you. Post a piece of code that follows the pattern that you predict, and then see if the actual example of not-so-well-written, non-ASCII-pure code can resonate in the minds of folks who aren't able to imagine the validity of your points without an example in front of them. I know that Ping has produced one example of deceptive non-ASCII-pure code, but it didn't really sway me, even though I've been basically sympatethic to his overall conservatism about either keeping ASCII purity or introducing Unicode only with some proper safeguards. ____________________________________________________________________________________ It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
