Phillip J. Eby wrote: > It allows the framework to bootstrap via successive > approximation. Initially, the 'implies()' function is just a plain > function, and then it later becomes a generic function. (And of > course it gets called in between those two points.) The same happens > for 'disjuncts()' and 'overrides()'.
But you know from the outset that these functions will eventually become generic, so why can't they be defined as some callable object that can have its insides switched, if you're on a Python whose normal function objects don't allow that? -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
