On 7/19/07, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19/07/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The only approach to retroactive generification that I approve of is > > replacing the entire object with a wrapper of sorts, e.g. > > > > foo = generify(foo) > > Which (again, just to clarify) means that you would require that > generic functions be introduced by a decorator? > > @generic > def foo(): > pass > > (your explicit equivalent would be for "after the fact" conversion to > a generic).
Yes. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
