Josiah Carlson wrote: > What made it really annoying is that there was no way to tell the heapq > module not to load the C version so that I could use a generic container.
I would say that all such dual-implementation modules should make the specific implementations available under different names, using some convention such as _c_heapq/_p_heapq. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
