Greg Ewing schrieb: > Josiah Carlson wrote: >> What made it really annoying is that there was no way to tell the heapq >> module not to load the C version so that I could use a generic container. > > I would say that all such dual-implementation modules should > make the specific implementations available under different > names, using some convention such as _c_heapq/_p_heapq.
You mean, like prefixing it with c, e.g. StringIO vs. cStringIO, pickle vs. cPickle? Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
