On 8/28/07, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benji York wrote: > > Blake Winton wrote: > >> On the one hand, I really like consistency in my programming languages. > >> On the other hand, a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. > > > > I call quote misapplication. Having predictable identifier names isn't > > "foolish". Having to divine what is and is not "necessary to improve > > readability" isn't either, but is perhaps suboptimal. > > On the gripping hand, breaking getattr, getitem, setattr, setitem, > delattr and delitem without a *really* good reason would mean seriously > annoying a heck of a lot of people for no real gain. > > Being more consistent in following PEP 8 would be good, particularly for > stuff which is going to break (or at least need to be looked at) anyway. > The question of whether or not to change things which would otherwise be > fine needs to be considered far more carefully.
The prudent way is to change the PEP (I'll do it) but to be conservative in implementation. The PEP should be used to guide new API design and the occasional grand refactoring; it should not be used as an excuse to change every non-conforming API. That said, I do want to get rid of all module and package names that still use CapitalWords. Module names are relatively easy to fix with 2to3. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
