On 9/10/07, Nicholas Bastin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I did redo my benchmark using 200 as the increment number instead of > > > 1, to duck any impact from the interning of small value ints in 2.6, > > > and it made no discernible difference in the results. > > > > I'm sorry, I've lost context. I'm not at all clear at this point what > > benchmark you might have ran. > > I posted a tiny snippet of code earlier in the thread that was a > sortof silly benchmark of integer math operations.
Can you report the exact code after all the changes you made, *and* the results that you are now comparing? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
