On 9/10/07, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Nicholas Bastin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > | Yeah, my point was mostly an aside to anyone that might have > | questioned my earlier results of a 2.3x slowdown on integer-sized > | values because I used 1. A quick switch to 200 netted the exact same > | results, > > Currently, 200 is a small, cached int just as 1 is ([-10,256] or so is > range).
Interesting, I didn't look at the code (obviously), but my understanding was that it was only positive integers below 100. -- Nick _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
