On 9/16/07, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Also "argv" sounds more low-level than something like "arguments". > > While we're on the subject of argv, I've been wondering > whether py3k might want to revisit the idea of having > argv[0] be the program name. In my experience, one almost > *never* wants to treat argv[0] the same way as the rest of > the arguments.
-1. If you want to put more meaning in the argv list, use an option parser. The _actual_ meaning of each element depends entirely on the program that's started. For Python-the-language, there isn't any difference between them. -- Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
