Guido van Rossum wrote: > This sounds awfully close to bikeshedding. I don't agree with that assessment. This is something I've had in mind for quite a while. Python optimises this for the *least* frequent use case, which is just plain silly, as far as I can see. The only reason for it is because that's the way C does it. That might be called a foolish consistency.
> Change too many details > like this and you cause death by a 1000 pinpricks for existing apps. That's why I'm not suggesting that argv itself be changed, but that something new be added for the more frequent use cases. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
