Guido van Rossum wrote: > Yeah -- the _ex suffix on the name suggests that that's the API we > wanted but we'd already released a version with a suboptimal API...
Hmmm, that convention isn't very scalable. What happens when you update the API again -- do you use an _ex_ex suffix? :-) Also it tends to make things look unpleasanty Microsoftish. :-( -- Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiem! | Christchurch, New Zealand | (I'm not a morning person.) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] +--------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
