On Feb 10, 2008 4:57 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Yeah -- the _ex suffix on the name suggests that that's the API we > > wanted but we'd already released a version with a suboptimal API... > > Hmmm, that convention isn't very scalable. What happens > when you update the API again -- do you use an _ex_ex > suffix? :-) > > Also it tends to make things look unpleasanty Microsoftish. :-(
Whine, whine. Do you have a better idea? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
