On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be worthwhile to leave reversed(s) and s[::-1] as the two obvious > ways to do it (ways that work with any Sequence, not just lists)?
But .reverse() is in-place, while the other two create new sequences, no? Steve -- I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity. --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
