On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be worthwhile to leave reversed(s) and s[::-1] as the two obvious > ways to do it (ways that work with any Sequence, not just lists)?
I think we should keep it. There's no faster way to reverse a list in place. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
